The petunia MADS box floral binding protein (fbp) gene 1 represents a class B homeotic gene determining the identity of second and third floral whorl organs. Suppression of fbp1, which is highly homologous to the Antirrhinum gene globosa and Arabidopsis gene pistillata, results in the conversion of petals to sepals and stamens to carpels. In contrast to fbp1, the petunia homeotic gene pMADS1, encoding a protein homologous to the Antirrhinum protein DEFICIENS, has been shown to be involved in the formation of petals only. We demonstrated that the induction of fbp1 is established independent of pMADS1, whereas at later developmental stages, fbp1 is up-regulated by pMADS1 in petals. On the other hand, the induction and maintenance of pMADS1 expression are not affected by fbp1. To obtain information about the functional interaction between fbp1 and pMADS1, an fbp1 cosuppression mutant with mild phenotypic alterations was crossed with a green petals mutant in which pMADS1 expression was abolished. Progeny plants, heterozygous for the pMADS1 gene, had flowers with a more pronounced reversion from petals into sepals than was observed for the parent fbp1 mutant. The morphology of the third whorl organs was not changed. These observations, together with expression levels of pMADS1 and fbp1 in mutant flowers, provide evidence for functional control of fbp1 by PMADS1 in vivo.

Genetic studies in Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum showed that petal determination requires the concomitant expression of two homeotic functions, A and B, whereas the A function alone determines sepal identity. The B function is represented by at least two genes. The Petunia homeotic gene green petal (gp) is essential for petal determination as demonstrated by a Petunia gp mutant that has sepals instead of petals. We have used ectopic expression of the gp gene as a tool to study flower development in Petunia. CaMV 35S-gp expression leads to homeotic conversion of sepals into petaloid organs when expressed early in development. This demonstrates that a single homeotic gene is sufficient to induce homeotic conversion of sepals to petals, suggesting that other petal determining genes are regulated in part by ectopically expressed gp. Indeed, two other MADS-box-containing genes, pmads 2 and fbp 1, which show homology to the Antirrhinum B function gene globosa, are activated in the converted petal tissue. Furthermore, our data provide evidence for autoregulation of gp expression in the petaloid tissue and uncover the role of gp in fusion of petal tissues.

The petunia mutant green petal (gp, line PLV) shows a homeotic effect in one floral whorl, that is, the conversion of petal to sepal. We demonstrate that this mutant contains a chromosomal deletion, including the petunia MADS box gene pMADS1. Second whorl petal development in this null mutant can be restored with a CaMV 35S-pMADS1 transgene, demonstrating the essential role of pMADS1 in this process. Because gp (PLV) shows only a minor effect on stamen development, the homeotic effects of pMADS1 are different from those of B-type genes in Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis. Two other MADS box genes, pMADS2 and fbp1 (Angenent et al. 1992), require pMADS1 to maintain expression in the second whorl. However, in the absence of pMADS1 these two genes continue to be expressed in the third whorl. The functions assigned to pMADS1 are further supported by experiments in which we phenocopy gp by cosuppression of pMADS1 gene expression. The flowers, obtained through cosuppression and phenotype restoration, display different degrees of sepal to petal conversion. Analysis of these flowers indicate that pMADS1 controls growth under the zone of petal and stamen initiation, which causes the corolla tube and stamen filaments to emerge as a congenitally fused structure.

We have initiated a systematic functional analysis of the MADS box, intervening region, K domain, C domain-type MADS box gene family in petunia. The starting point for this has been a reverse-genetics approach, aiming to select for transposon insertions into any MADS box gene. We have developed and applied a family signature insertion screening protocol that is highly suited for this purpose, resulting in the isolation of 32 insertion mutants in 20 different MADS box genes. In addition, we identified three more MADS box gene insertion mutants using a candidate-gene approach. The defined insertion lines provide a sound foundation for a systematic functional analysis of the MADS box gene family in petunia. Here, we focus on the analysis of Floral Binding Protein2 (FBP2) and FBP5 genes that encode the E-function, which in Arabidopsis has been shown to be required for B and C floral organ identity functions. fbp2 mutants display sepaloid petals and ectopic inflorescences originating from the third floral whorl, whereas fbp5 mutants appear as wild type. In fbp2 fbp5 double mutants, reversion of floral organs to leaf-like organs is increased further. Strikingly, ovules are replaced by leaf-like structures in the carpel, indicating that in addition to the B- and C-functions, the D-function, which specifies ovule development, requires E-function activity. Finally, we compare our data with results obtained using cosuppression approaches and conclude that the latter might be less suited for assigning functions to individual members of the MADS box gene family.

Antirrhinum majus DEFICIENS (DEF) and Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA3 (AP3) MADS box proteins are required to specify petal and stamen identity. Sampling of DEF/AP3 homologs revealed two types of DEF/AP3 proteins, euAP3 and TOMATO MADS BOX GENE6 (TM6), within core eudicots, and we show functional divergence in Petunia hybrida euAP3 and TM6 proteins. Petunia DEF (also known as GREEN PETALS [GP]) is expressed mainly in whorls 2 and 3, and its expression pattern remains unchanged in a blind (bl) mutant background, in which the cadastral C-repression function in the perianth is impaired. Petunia TM6 functions as a B-class organ identity protein only in the determination of stamen identity. Atypically, Petunia TM6 is regulated like a C-class rather than a B-class gene, is expressed mainly in whorls 3 and 4, and is repressed by BL in the perianth, thereby preventing involvement in petal development. A promoter comparison between DEF and TM6 indicates an important change in regulatory elements during or after the duplication that resulted in euAP3- and TM6-type genes. Surprisingly, although TM6 normally is not involved in petal development, 35S-driven TM6 expression can restore petal development in a def (gp) mutant background. Finally, we isolated both euAP3 and TM6 genes from seven solanaceous species, suggesting that a dual euAP3/TM6 B-function system might be the rule in the Solanaceae.